Skip to content
Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

ADVERTISE WITH US | EMAIL: KROX@RRV.NET

CROOKSTON AIRPORT COMMISSION REVIEWS ALTERNATIVE OPTIONS TO CONSIDER FOR MASTER PLAN

The Crookston Airport Commission met on Thursday morning to review the progress made by Short Elliot Hendrickson (SEH) engineering on the airport master plan. The Crookston Airport is used for approximately 50,981 operations, a takeoff or landing, a year, and is the most used airport by the University of North Dakota flight program.

SEH’s Melissa Underwood said the goal was to provide some alternative options for runways, hangars, and the other airport needs to discuss what the needs for the airport would be within the next 20 years. “Today, our goal was to take the forecast we’d developed last time and determine the needs that need to be met over the next 20 years,” said Underwood. “That goes on both the air side with the runways, taxiways, and approaches. And on the land side with hangars and the apron. We’re trying to determine what layout will work best for the community, city, and airport users for the next 20 years.”

The commission discussed possible runway expansion, such as extending the current paved runway to 5,600 feet to allow for small jets to take off, or changing the primary runway to a north/south orientation. Either possible change being made at some point would come with the need to close or reroute established roadways, with one plan making a rerouting of HWY 75 out of the safety area possible.  None of the options have been approved, and Underwood said the goal throughout the rest of the project is to determine what will be needed in the future and find the best option. “We’re looking at what runway length is needed over the next 20 years,” said Underwood. “And then, looking at the crosswind to see if another paved runway is an option or if we will maintain what’s out there today.”

Airport Manager Lowell Miller said there are many points of view on planning for the future, but the goal is to find what the community would use. Changes can’t happen without the ability to justify them for funding from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). “There are many points of view on that,” said Miller. “You’ll get some people that will say maintain what you have, and it seems to be working. There is quite the expansion to get larger airplanes that may come. You need to show that you need to get to their ultimate length. You have to figure out if there are people in the community who are going to use that length to justify the cost. The FAA has to have that justification to participate in those funds.”

Hangars continue to be a need, and several options were discussed, including building box or T-Hangars. Or even providing individuals or businesses the opportunity to develop their own hangars to their specifications, and then turn them over to the city when done through a lease agreement. Miller told the commission that if the city were to start building a hangar, it would probably be fully leased before it was finished.  Miller said deciding how to develop hangars or even using a combination of the hangar options would be about what fits best for Crookston. “There are a few options whether the city builds new T-hangars to store airplanes or we allow private companies and people to build their hangars,” said Miller. “There are a couple of options, maybe a combination of both. Just looking for alternatives for what fits our airport.”

Underwood said SEH would refine the alternatives for runways and hangars with the Minnesota Department of Transportation and FAA based on Thursday’s discussions. “Next, we’ll refine our alternatives based on the discussion today,” said Underwood. “And narrow it down to a few that the group can choose to show on the 20-year plan.”

The master planning process is expected to require at least two more meetings, according to Underwood, with the next meeting to be scheduled for around early October tentatively.

Share:
Tags: , , , , , , ,