Skip to content
Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

ADVERTISE WITH US | EMAIL: KROX@RRV.NET

CROOKSTON CITY ADMINISTRATOR SAYS NO DECISION HAS BEEN MADE ON POSSIBLE PROPERTY PURCHASE

The Crookston City Council held a closed session on Monday, March 7, to discuss the possible purchase of parcels 82.00162.02 and 82.00162.09, which total 62.33 acres east of the Nature View Estates on Eickhof Blvd. KROX spoke with City Administrator Amy Finch after receiving information that the City Council had decided during that session not to go forward with a purchase, in part due to wetlands on the property.  

Finch said the City Council doesn’t vote or make decisions in closed meetings but wouldn’t comment further until a summary report is released with the City Council packet for the March 22 meeting at the end of the week. “The City Council does not take votes during a closed meeting, so (it’s) discussion and giving staff direction if further information is required for their consideration,” said Finch. “What I expect we will see with the next agenda packet is a summary of the closed meeting, which is required by state statute. And I expect we may see a report on the conclusion of the closed meeting, but at this time, I’m not able to provide comment on that.”

Also, responding to whether anyone associated with the City was attempting to dissuade the City Council from proceeding with the purchase, Finch said, “the job of staff as it relates to City Council decisions is not to talk out of or talk them into any decision. It is our job to provide all of the information that we believe is relevant and needed to help them make that decision or provide direction to the staff. There are some discussions about wetlands in that area. But again, once that summary report comes out, and what I expect to be the conclusion report, I expect those questions will be answered.”

In a follow, Finch was asked whether a possible issue with wetlands was present, was it not considered on recent development over the past few years in that area, or did it not impact those projects. Finch again said she’d wait for the report before commenting. “I’m not going to provide comment on that until we are certain we’ll have the report with the conclusion,” said Finch. “I do think the summary and report will help provide answers to some of those questions.”

 

Share:
Tags: , , ,