Skip to content
Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

ADVERTISE WITH US | EMAIL: KROX@RRV.NET

MINNESOTA AUTO DEALERS CLAIM MPCA MISREPRESENTS ELECTRIC VEHICLE DATA

On Tuesday, the trade association representing Minnesota’s new car dealers exposed the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency’s use of misleading numbers to promote their desire to impose California Car mandates on Minnesota consumers.

The revelation came during the association’s testimony before an administrative law judge on the need and reasonableness of the proposed California Car rule.

“MPCA’s analysis is unreasonable because it is based on faulty data,” stated MADA Vice President of Public Affairs Amber Backhaus.

“The MPCA points to a lack of electric vehicles (EVs) for sale in the state as a reason for the agency to use its regulatory authority to adopt ZEV,” Backhaus explained. “However, the MPCA vastly undercounts the EV supply by pulling data from cars.com. Cars.com is NOT an aggregator of vehicle supply; it’s a third-party advertising platform.”

Backhaus went on to inform the administrative law judge that, “MADA’s own analysis of EV supply, pulled from manufacturer websites on a variety of dates, shows at least twice as many EVs on dealer lots in Minnesota as what was listed on cars.com.”

“For over a year now the MPCA has been claiming a lack of availability of EVs as the reason they need the California Rule,” stated MADA President Scott Lambert. “We don’t know if it was deliberate or sloppy work, but they have misled the public, policymakers, and even Governor Walz and should be held accountable for their actions.”

In her testimony, Backhaus asked the administrative law judge to pause the rulemaking while the Biden Administration pursues more stringent vehicle emissions standards and California updates its rules to phase-out the sale of vehicles with internal combustion engines by 2035.

“The MPCA’s numbers in the SONAR about EV availability are woefully inaccurate,” concluded Backhaus.

MADA is the statewide trade association representing 375 franchised new car and truck dealers. The association conducts lobbying, legal work, and training for its members.

Share:
Tags: , , , , , ,